Gary Kreep is representing Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, in Barnett, et. al. v. Obama, while other plaintiffs are represented by Orly Taitz. Drake and Robinson released the services of Taitz, due to their concerns about her competence and her overall effect on the case. Near this time, Alan Keyes decided not to remain the lead plaintiff, while remaining in the case.
If it pleases the reader, become a listener to the entire interview of under one hour, rather than I.O. transcribing excerpts, here. You may hear MommaE "question with boldness" and Mr. Kreep, respect those questions with informative answers.For further reporting and analysis of the issues of the last two weeks of Barnett v. Obama, I.O. suggests reading the article prior to this and its comments: "Orly Taitz Watch: Saboteur? - Judge Carter's Orders," as well as the article to which it refers, and its set of comments, in TheRightSideofLife: "Barnett v. Obama: Order, Motion on Letters Rogatory, Discovery; Subpoenas? Really?; More Docs."
For further information on the issues and troubles orbiting Orly Taitz in these proceedings, you may also wish to read the pertinent news articles linked by the blog of Gary Kreep's United States Justice Foundation.
A profile of Gary Kreep is also submitted on that site.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To this, your correspondent will add the following personal opinions, the first, from the comments to yesterday's article, "Orly Taitz Accused of Suborning Perjury for Barnett v. Obama - Updated Including Affidavit, etc.:
There are two attorneys involved on the nbC side, in Barnett v. Obama. From what I can tell...Barnett, et. al., v. Obama might still have a chance of success, if its plaintiffs were only to have counsel which does not undermine and subvert the case.
One of them has been honest.
One of them has experience trying cases competently.
One of them has not made any ridiculous predictions.
One of them has demonstrated the ability to read.
One of them has responded to motions the way an attorney does.
One of them has attracted only one motion from Obama against the cause (the other, two).
One of them has not tried to remove litigants!
One of them has spoken of gaining the assistance of other, experienced federal counsel.
One of them does not leave a trail of wreckage wherever that one goes.
One of them is not well on the way to intentionally or unintentionally wrecking one's own case.
One of them deserves professional respect.
One of them shows the behavior of an attorney who honors the sacred trust of one's clients and supporters.
September 16, 2009 12:37 AM
Marxist and fascist revolutions come accompanied by well planned and executed sabotage. We see that in the application and timing of the "mortgage meltdown," in the work of ACORN, George Soros, Herb and Marion Sandler, and in my opinion, Sec. Henry Paulson, COB Ben Bernanke, Sen. Charles Schumer, and whatever other members of Congress, including Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank.
Further, we see it in the planned destruction of free America and our wealth and economy (while building the state-dependent proletariat forces) in the "stimulus act," in "healthcare reform," in "cap and trade," and in "Federal Reserve oversight."
I do not know whether or not Orly Taitz is an intentional saboteur. I only see it obvious that she behaves like one. If Dr. Taitz were not front and center, the insurrection would be remiss.
No comments:
Post a Comment