











1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya is, on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963…2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), becomes a citizen of Kenya on the 12th of December, 1963.
press contact: Sam Sewell, National spokesman for AmericanGrandJury.org
email: writerpromo@comcast.net
fax (239) 591-1987
phone: clinic office -- (239) 591-4565 -- ask for Dr. Sam
by Mark S. McGrew
In all 50 States of the United States of America, Tea Parties were held to protest massive government waste and oppression. The counts of how many people attended these peaceful rallies are still coming in. Early estimates are over 1 million people and may go as high as 3 million or more. The day of objecting to government bailouts for corporate crooks and a government who refuses to respect its citizens took place on a weekday, when most people go to their jobs or have classes.
The protests against a government out of control took place in over 2,000 locations, the largest protest in American history. It is possible that more would have shown up if they were not required to be elsewhere.
The major news networks, except FOX News, spent the day ridiculing, harassing and insulting honest Americans who have a Constitutional Right to protest their government. They continuously lied to their viewers as to the reason for this enormous protest.
They said it was to protest taxes or any number of ridiculous claims. Other than FOX, Major Media steadfastly refused to report any truth about Who, What, Where, When, and Why. All stories are composed of those 5 Ws. Each W was used as a test to see just how much lying and ridicule the viewers would accept.
The hideous demon witch from another dimension, CNN reporter Susan Roesgen's insidious verbal aggression against Illinois demonstrators infuriated the crowd. When they returned her insults she crept away, behind her barricade with security guards and turned to the camera and told the viewers that the protesters were "anti-CNN". No, Susan, they are anti-loudmouth, lying, hysterical, insulting lunatics, like you. For whatever reason, CNN shut down her email at 8:32pm the day after the protests.
This YouTube.com video of her is before and after the CNN camera operators got smart and pulled her plug. You can see for yourself what American viewers have to put up with to try to get some truthful news of our own Country. But the most despicable actions of the spit polished, shiny faced, smiling Jack newscasters was their steady bombardment of their viewers with sexually depraved insults against the protesters. America’s Major Media, with no moral boundaries, brought their filthy, trashy mouths into the homes of decent, honest, churchgoing people with children present.
The term “Teabagging” will not be explained here. Adults will figure it out and children don’t need to know. Most of us had no idea what it was, until having the term constantly shouted at us by Major News degenerates. It’s amazing how these people come up with the same insults, the same lies, the same arrogant attitudes and the same sexual deviate analogies at the same time on the same day.
CNN anchor Anderson Cooper made "teabagging" references while the CNN analyst, David Gergen, made snide comments about Republicans "searching for their voice." And "It's hard to talk when you're teabagging,"
MSNBC's David Shuster, "Teabagging day for the right wing and they are going nuts for it." The rallies were "full-throated" and "toothless," and "They want to give President Obama a strong tongue-lashing and lick government spending." And he just couldn’t keep from mentioning how the protesters "whipped out" the demonstrations this past week.
Questioning whether these are sexually explicit jokes or not, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and her disgusting guest, Air America's Ana Marie Cox, were happy to explain. By one count, the two of them used the word "teabag" more than 50 times on one show. Ana Marie Cox informed an unknowing audience, with no room for doubt that she is one sick cookie, when she told us to see Urbandictionary.com for the term "teabagging."
"Well, there is a lot of love in teabagging," Cox said. This is one seriously disgusting, sick, psychopathic animal to be bringing this kind of filth into people’s homes.
What this all means to me is that the major news networks are scared of losing their rankings and their jobs. They see newspapers going bankrupt and closing and they know they are next if they don’t get more viewers. Some idiot from Harvard Law School must have told them to “Get in you viewer’s faces and show them how disgusting you are.”
And as in all things in this brave new World of Obama, they had to bring up the cowardly racist American male.
Janeane Garofalo, who plays a small role in Keifer Sutherland’s show “24” was on MSNBC's "The Countdown" with Keith Olbermann Thursday evening. This dysfunctional creature from Hell said, “It's about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks. There is no way around that. The Republican party has crystallized into the white power movement".
As for the only Major news reporting the truth, FOX Broadcasting, Garofalo, with bizzarre hatred, could only relate FOX to the Ku Klux Klan, "Who else is Fox talking to? Urban older white guys and their girlfriends who suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.”
These people brought lies, rascism and sexual acts into your living room, shouting out a sexual term that few of us knew, until we and our children were shown where to find the defintion of “Teabagging”. What else, besides lies and pornography will they expose our children to? Anything they want and you won’t know it until it is too late.
Words can not describe how Major Media has violated our trust and will do so again. Is it any wonder major Newspapers have been going out of business?
To object to the behavior of CNN and MSNBC, you may file a complaint at the Federal Communications Commission, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Consumer
Complaints at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Or call 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322), or Email to: fccinfo@fcc.gov. Include this article to explain the nature of your complaint. You may also go to their web site at http://www.fcc.gov
Don’t let these people get away with bringing their filthy behavior into your home.
Mark S. McGrew may be reached at McGrewMX@aol.com
FOXNews.comAnyone should know that a Marxist or fascist regime's propaganda campaign is strategically designed to support its outrageous actions against the freedom of The People - or in the infamous words of Biden, Sunday 10/19/2008, things that make us go "Whoa!"
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Napolitano: Veterans are Targets of Right-Wing Extremist Recruiters
Homeland security chief says report could have been written differently, but imperative was to release details on right-wing extremists.
WASHINGTON -- The head of homeland security said Sunday she regrets that some people took offense over a report warning that right-wing extremist groups were trying to recruit disgruntled troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
But Secretary Janet Napolitano added that "a number of groups far too numerous to mention" want to commit domestic terrorism attacks and are looking for new recruits.
She told a cable news network the warning report that went out to American law enforcement agencies was consistent with reports that were issued before.
"Here is the important point. The report is not saying that veterans are extremists. Far from it. What it is saying is returning veterans are targets of right-wing extremist groups that are trying to recruit those to commit violent acts within the country. We want to do all we can to prevent that," she said.
The intelligence assessment released to law enforcement on April 7 claims news of recession, the election of an African American president [calling patriots for a Constitutional America racists] rumors of new gun restrictions and the inability of veterans to reintegrate create fertile ground for radicalizing and recruiting right-wing extremists [Where is the evidence? - a common request of Barry Soetoro]
Of particular interest among radicals is possible recruitment of returning troops with "combat skills and experience" so as to boost their "violent capabilities," the report said. [Evidence? You mean all that "violent capability" expressed during the Tea Party protests that were reportedly under FBI surveillance? Oops, no violence. Notice she says "violent capability" - only the mere capability to be violent - i.e., owning guns constitutionally suitable for a critically important constitutional militia to carry.]
It added that new restrictions on gun ownership and the difficulty of veterans to reintegrate into their communities "could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks." [Translation: if we support the letter and spirit of the 2nd Amendment vs. authoritarianism including confiscation of our arms, we are this regime's enemy.]
On Thursday, Napolitano apologized for some of the wording in the report, after civil liberties officials at the Homeland Security Department said the report was issued without a change in some of the language that had been subject for dispute.
"To the extent veterans read it as an accusation ... an apology is owed," Napolitano said during an on-air interview on FOX News Thursday. "This was an assessment, not an accusation." [They are after the minds and hearts of the military and law enforcement community, after all.]
But American Legion National Commander David Rehbein, who is to meet with Napolitano on Friday, told FOX News on Sunday the evidence suggests that troops are more likely to be first responders than extremists during an attack on the homeland. He added that he is less concerned about the apology than about the way the department reached its conclusions. [Translation: What are you trying to pull?]
"I'm hoping we can talk about the methods the department used as they begin to continue their job of assuring hoped secured and they have a big job, an important job and we need to make sure they are really going about it in the right way, so they can be most effective," he said. [Translation: This regime is under scrutiny, by those sworn to uphold the United States Constitution.]
"Trying to monitor a group of several million veterans, is frankly going to cost them a lot of time and resources, they don't have, that they could better spend monitoring already identified groups," Rehbein said. [Translation: Why surveil law abiding, patriotic citizens? What about the real terrorists? No, really, why?]
Napolitano said that in retrospect anything in the report could have been written differently, but "a fair reading of the report" would show that it is not trying to "give offense" but providing "situational awareness." [The propaganda campaign aimed at turning especially America's military and law enforcement community against defending the Constitution will continue.]
You see, John Ziegler is producer of "Media Malpractice; How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted." Keep that in mind, as you watch what happened to him.
ALL2. Now see what just happened to videographer, John Ziegler, 4/15, outside an event lauding Katie Couric for her interviewing prowess, during the presidential campaign. Sarah Palin got it then; Palin sympathizer, Ziegler gets it just lately. You see, John Ziegler is producer of "Media Malpractice; How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted." Keep that in mind, as you watch what happened to him.
Please take the time to view this film. This is why gun sales are up. People are becoming more and more afraid of our government and law enforcement. We remember WACO and RUBY RIDGE.
I remember the brutality that prolifers have suffered at the hands of the police. In Pa. 12 Evangelists were beaten and jailed for kneeling in prayer. That is just one case.
10 Steps to Fascism, Naomi Wolf
- Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy
- Create a gulag
- Develop a thug caste
- Set up an internal surveillance system
- Harass citizens' groups
- Engage in arbitrary detention and release
- Target key individuals
- Control the press
- Dissent equals treason
- Suspend the rule of law
So who or what is a Grand Jury?
Most Americans, including most Judges, most prosecutors and most lawyers think a Grand Jury is a function of the government, at the whim of the government, under the control and direction of the government. However, this is constitutionally false and always has been.
Americans are educated to believe that America has three branches of government: The Judicial, The Legislative and the Executive and that is they who decide our lives. This also is false. There is a Constitutional force which has power, authority and dominance over those three branches.
That is the The Grand Jury of We the People. The Grand Jury was intended to give the people of the United States of America total control over a potentially corrupt government and to enable prosecution of corrupt or criminal government officials, agents and employees, whether they were elected, hired or appointed.
The Constitution of The United States of America was created and designed to give the individual or collective people of
United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):
Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.
To be crystal clear: The Grand Jury is a constitutional fixture in its own right. The Grand Jury is not a tool of government to use against its citizens. Justice Scalia determined further, to reinforce that there is no question as to the purpose of the Grand Jury:
In fact, the whole theory of its foundation is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between Government and the people. Although the Grand Jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges direct involvement in the Grand Jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the Grand Jurors together and administering their oath of office.
Besides providing for society to charge individual people for crimes, the Grand Jury is a tool for the citizens to use against a criminal government or our government acting against the designs of our Constitution. And it was specifically designed to prosecute the criminal actions of government employees and their lawyers.
Any judge who tells a jury to “disregard that remark or disregard that evidence” is violating the US Constitution and can and should be indicted by a Common Law Grand Jury.
Any Congressperson, Senator, Governor or police officer who violates the constitution can and should be indicted by a Common Law Grand Jury, without the advice, consent, permission or interference of any government employee.
This is why America has always been promoted as a land where no man is above the law, including the President.
However, in 1946, certain people hijacked the role of our Grand Jury and the courtroom jury and henceforth, embarked on a mission of misinformation, distortions, and blatant lies to convince the American people and the entire legal community, that it is the government that determines what is right and what is wrong inthe actions of the government or of any elected government officials, employees or agents.
In an article in the Creighton Law Review, Volume 33. number 4, 1999-2000, Roger Roots, Juris Doctorate wrote:
In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without government influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past.
Judges and prosecutors and attorneys began using the phrase “runaway grand jury” to create ridicule and scorn upon a jury that chose to think for themselves, which is the Constitutional Right of any jury. Roger Roots continues:
A runaway grand jury, loosely defined as a grand jury which resists the accusatory choices of a government prosecutor, has been virtually eliminated by modern criminal procedure. Today’s ‘runaway’ grand jury is in fact, the common law grand jury of the past. Prior to the emergence of governmental prosecution as the standard model for American criminal justice, all grand juries were in fact runaways, according to the definition of modern times. They operated as completely independent, self-directing bodies of inquisitors, with power to pursue unlawful conduct to its very source, including the government itself.
In 1946, The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. In those procedures, they made a rule to punish runaway grand juries. Rule 6(g): “At any time for cause shown, the court may excuse a juror either temporarily or permanently, and in the latter event the court may impanel another person in place of the juror excused.”
Now judges could throw anyone off a grand jury, or even dis-impanel a grand jury entirely, merely for exercising its own discretion and not doing what the court or prosecutor tells them to do.
All laws in
Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has an added “Note 4” which directly conflicts with, ignores and willfully violates the fifth amendment of the US Constitution which states clearly: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on the presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.”
Note 4 of Rule 7 states: “Presentment is not included as an additional type of formal accusation, since presentments as a method of instituting prosecutions are obsolete, at least as concerns the Federal courts.” They rewrote the US Constitution to suit their own purposes.
There are only two ways that the US Constitution can be changed:
Method 1: A minimum of two thirds of the US House of Representatives AND a minimum of two thirds of the US Senate must agree on a proposed change to the Constitution, AND then a minimum of three quarters (38 of the current 50) of the state legislatures OR state conventions must agree to every word, comma, and period of the proposed change to the Constitution. Passage in the state legislatures is by simple majority in the state House AND in the state Senate. Passage in the state conventions is also by simple majority. Typically, a time limit of seven years is imposed for ratification, after which the proposal expires, worthless. This is the only method that has been used to date. The requirement for a state convention has been specified only once.
Method 2: A minimum of two thirds of the state legislatures (34 of the current 50), House AND Senate, must call for a Constitutional Convention. The convention proposes one or more amendments, which must then be approved by simple majority by a minimum of three quarters of the state legislatures (House AND Senate) OR by a minimum of three quarters of the state conventions. This method has never been used.
Most certainly a bunch of crooked lawyers writing their own rules to corrupt the jury system can not override the US Constitution.
But they did.
And, as Susan Brenner wrote in The Voice of the Community: A Case for Jury Independence, “Now, federal grand jurors cannot return charges in the form of an indictment without a prosecutor’s consent.”
If a grand jury and a courtroom jury have to do only what the judge and prosecutor say, and a prosecutor can refuse to indict and charge a politician or another lawyer, what is the reason to have any jury? Only to perpetuate a myth that Americans live under a system where no man is above the law. There is no other reason.
As the American judicial system now operates, judges and prosecutors can pick and choose who they send to prison. And they guarantee that they and their friends can go on with their criminal behavior unmolested.
The American Juror published a commentary regarding Note 4 of Rule 7: [Retaining the constitutional right of grand juries to determine evidence and witnesses] might encourage the use of the run-away grand jury as the grand jury could act from their own knowledge or observation and not only from charges made by the United States Attorney (Prosecutor).”
So, the American government employees took the bold step to violate the US Constitution on a continuing, repeated basis and gave defendants a “jury of their peers” that would and could, only nod to the prosecutor and judge and say only, “Yes sir. No sir. You’re right sir. Whatever you say, sir.”
This kind of behavior was outlawed in the year 1215 by the English Magna Carta, which the founders of the United States of American adopted as their basis for how Americans were going to live and be treated by the government that they would employ.
The authors of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are the true criminals and should have been dragged out of their homes and hanged from the nearest tree.
Now, sixty-three years later, the American people are fed up with the treasonous acts of their government employees and their rigged courts. And they have found a way to rid this country of the “domestic enemies” that our Constitution warned us to be prepared for.
The site, http://americangrandjury.org/ explains the process and how to form a constitutionally acceptable Common Law Grand Jury and bring presentments or indictments in any location in America and begin prosecuting corrupt government employees, at any level of government. No longer should they be referred to as officials or agents. They are our employees and if they do not want to respect that, they need to find a friendly third world country to live in.
Mr. Carl Swensson of the State of Georgia successfully organized a Common Law Grand Jury and that Grand Jury reviewed evidence against Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Obama and is recommending an indictment. The US Attorney, who was presented with that recommendation, has refused to discuss it by saying, “We only deal with lawyers.” The Attorney General’s office of the State of Georgia has also been presented with that recommendation and has also refused, saying, “We don’t represent citizens.”
Everyone should call US Federal Attorney, David Nahmias at 404-581-6000 or fax him at 404-581-6181 and tell him to do his job. Every person should also call the State of
On Mr. Swensson’s website at www.RiseUpForAmerica.com you can see the process he went through, to organize a Common Law Grand Jury.
You will also find that Common Law Grand Juries in Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio also have seen the evidence and are making a presentment to charge the illegal alien Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama. More Common Law Grand Juries across American are being scheduled as of this writing.
A two hour Internet radio broadcast on April 9, 2009 has Carl Swensson of www.RiseUpForAmerica.com, Bob Campbell of http://americangrandjury.org and the spokesman for American Grand Jury, Sam Sewell explaining the Grand Jury actions against Obama, how Grand Juries can be used to rid local communities of corrupt government employees, and how citizens can form their own Common Law Grand Jury groups. That broadcast can be listened to or downloaded at this site:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Sentinel_Radio/2009/04/10/The-Mark-S-McGrew-Show Please allow a few minutes for this show to start playing.
American people are uniting, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean in the form of “Tea Parties” named after the Boston Tea Party demands of “No Taxation Without Representation” in the year 1773, which helped start the American Revolutionary War with England in 1775. Tea parties are being held for people to object to unconstitutional government acts, taxes and loss of freedoms.
In less than 30 days, demonstrations have been organized and are scheduled in 2,000 communities, starting
Something World leaders had better understand and understand well: Obama and his mentally deranged friends are not going to destroy America any more than countless other socialist fascist fanatics have tried in the past.
If World leaders want to keep their jobs and keep their nations’ economies intact, they would be smart to drop Obama like a hot potato. Obama and his backers are pulling a giant scam on the rest of the World, just as they have on American voters.
Americans have wised up. It is only the major media that keeps pounding the drums of the Obama lie. Ask yourselves a question: Why are many of
Nothing Obama does will continue. Everything he does will be retracted by a very near future administration.
One thing that is certain, of all that can be observed about the current Obama administration, corporate executive friends of Obama, and the American judicial system: Whether in the boardroom, the courtroom or the bathroom, scum sticks together. When the scum is annoying enough, it is scrubbed, cleaned and thrown in the trash. That’s why people have cleansers and society has prisons.
World leaders are making a very dangerous mistake to think that we, the people of
Here’s your first clue: The very first line of the US Constitution says, “We the people… establish this Constitution”.
Mark S. McGrew may be reached at McGrewMX@aol.com